﻿<metadata>
  <idinfo>
    <citation>
      <citeinfo>
        <origin>Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD)</origin>
        <origin>Aerial Information Systems (AIS)</origin>
        <origin>California Native Plant Society (CNPS)</origin>
        <pubdate>20140307</pubdate>
        <title>Vegetation - Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD) [ds996]</title>
        <geoform>vector digital data</geoform>
        <onlink>https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/BIOS</onlink>
        <onlink>https://filelib.wildlife.ca.gov/Public/BDB/GIS/BIOS/Public_Datasets/900_999/ds996.zip</onlink>
      </citeinfo>
    </citation>
    <descript>
      <abstract>The Vegetation Program of the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) has worked collaboratively with the Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD) and Aerial Information Systems (AIS) to produce a fine-scale vegetation classification and map on MMWD lands. Two main project goals were 1) to provide detailed, floristic classification of the vegetation with a report defining the different vegetation types, 2) to provide a detailed vegetation map of the region. Field data are being collected using standard CNPS protocols (e.g., Vegetation Rapid Assessment and Relevé protocols). The field-based classification depicts vegetation types that were sampled in 419 CNPS Vegetation Rapid Assessments and Relevés by MMWD staff In 2009 the map completed in 2006 was updated in part to understand how Sudden Oak Death (SOD) had changed the plant communities. The first map was based on aerial imagery flown in 2004 varying from 1/2 ft. to 1 ft. in resolution. The remap used similar imagery flown in 2009. This remap did not include the two outlying area around the Soulajule and Nicasio reservoirs. The attributes in this dataset reflect this, showing two sets of attributes for most of the area.</abstract>
      <purpose>The vegetation map and survey data help ensure the MMWD is better equipped to manage the vegetation for long-term ecological sustenance. In the future, agencies can compare areas based on vegetation diversity and habitat quality to identify best management regimes for such things as fire hazards, proper trail/road placement, restoration, and other management considerations. This dataset also can be used to assess impacts on vegetation by Sudden Oak Death between 2004 and 2009.</purpose>
      <supplinf>https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=16318 and https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=16314</supplinf>
    </descript>
    <timeperd>
      <timeinfo>
        <sngdate>
          <caldate>20090101</caldate>
        </sngdate>
      </timeinfo>
      <current>ground condition</current>
    </timeperd>
    <status>
      <progress>Complete</progress>
      <update>As needed</update>
    </status>
    <spdom>
      <bounding>
        <westbc>-122.796300</westbc>
        <eastbc>-122.559367</eastbc>
        <northbc>38.160835</northbc>
        <southbc>37.904228</southbc>
      </bounding>
    </spdom>
    <keywords>
      <theme>
        <themekt>None</themekt>
        <themekey>natural resources</themekey>
        <themekey>vegetation</themekey>
        <themekey>vegetation communities</themekey>
      </theme>
      <theme>
        <themekt>ISO 19115 Topic Categories</themekt>
        <themekey>biota</themekey>
      </theme>
      <place>
        <placekt>None</placekt>
        <placekey>Marin County</placekey>
        <placekey>California</placekey>
      </place>
    </keywords>
    <accconst>None</accconst>
    <useconst>This dataset is the exclusive property of the Marin Municipal Water District. Re-use of these materials in any manner other than in conjunction with activities authorized by the District is prohibited. User understands and agrees that it is possible that errors and omissions will occur in data input or programming done by the District to provide the data in the form desired. The user further understands and agrees that it is probable when large numbers of records are developed and maintained, and that data may not meet the users standards as to accuracy or completeness. Notwithstanding, the user agrees to take the data "as is", fully expecting that there may be errors and omissions associated with the data. The user further understands and agrees that the District makes absolutely no warranty whatsoever, whether expressed or implied, as to the accuracy, thoroughness, value, quality, validity, merchantability, suitability, condition or fitness for a particular purpose of the data or any programming used to obtain the data, nor s to whether the data are error-free, up-to-date, complete or based upon accurate or meaningful facts. The user understands and agrees that it will forever waive any and all rights, claims, causes of action or other recourse that it might otherwise have against the District for any injuries or damages of any type, whether direct, indirect, incidental, consequential or otherwise, resulting from any error or omission in the data or in any programming used to obtain the data, or in any manner arising out of or related to this Agreement or the data provided hereunder. User agrees that the District shall not be liable for any liability, claim, loss, damage, injury or expense of any kind caused or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly, by the inadequacy of data obtained from the District, by any deficiency of District or user systems, by any delay or failure to provide any service, or by any other interruption, disruption or loss of user operations.Disclaimer: The State makes no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or adequacy of these data and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in these data. No warranty of any kind, implied, expressed, or statutory, including but not limited to the warranties of non-infringement of third party rights, title, merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and freedom from computer virus, is given with respect to these data.</useconst>
    <ptcontac>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntorgp>
          <cntorg>Marin Municipal Water District</cntorg>
          <cntper>Andrea Williams</cntper>
        </cntorgp>
        <cntpos>Vegetation Ecologist</cntpos>
        <cntemail>awilliams@marinwater.org</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </ptcontac>
    <datacred>Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD)</datacred>
    <native> Version 6.2 (Build 9200) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.5.1.7333</native>
  </idinfo>
  <spdoinfo>
    <direct>Vector</direct>
    <ptvctinf>
      <sdtsterm>
        <sdtstype>GT-polygon composed of chains</sdtstype>
        <ptvctcnt>5885</ptvctcnt>
      </sdtsterm>
    </ptvctinf>
  </spdoinfo>
  <spref>
    <horizsys>
      <planar>
        <mapproj>
          <mapprojn>NAD 1983 California Teale Albers</mapprojn>
          <albers>
            <stdparll>34.0</stdparll>
            <stdparll>40.5</stdparll>
            <longcm>-120.0</longcm>
            <latprjo>0.0</latprjo>
            <feast>0.0</feast>
            <fnorth>-4000000.0</fnorth>
          </albers>
        </mapproj>
        <planci>
          <plance>coordinate pair</plance>
          <coordrep>
            <absres>0.0001</absres>
            <ordres>0.0001</ordres>
          </coordrep>
          <plandu>meter</plandu>
        </planci>
      </planar>
      <geodetic>
        <horizdn>D North American 1983</horizdn>
        <ellips>GRS 1980</ellips>
        <semiaxis>6378137.0</semiaxis>
        <denflat>298.257222101</denflat>
      </geodetic>
    </horizsys>
  </spref>
  <eainfo>
    <detailed>
      <enttyp>
        <enttypl>ds996</enttypl>
        <enttypd>Vegetation - Marin Municipal Water District (MMWD) [ds996]</enttypd>
      </enttyp>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>OBJECTID</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Internal feature number.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Esri</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <udom>Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.</udom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>SHAPE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Feature geometry.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Esri</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <udom>Coordinates defining the features.</udom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>NVCSNAME</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The standardized name of the vegetation description used in the National Vegetation Classification System.  Since the NVCS does not have categories for human land use or otherwise unvegetated land, those descriptions were drawn from the California Wildlife Habitat Relationship.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://usnvc.org</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>NVCSLEVEL</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The standardized level of the vegetation description used in the National Vegetation Classification System.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://usnvc.org</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>MAPCLASS</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The finest level of vegetation type mapped (alliance, association, group or macrogroup); or land use for polygons that are not natural vegetation, per the mapping classification.  This reflects the 2009 interpretation for the Mt. Tamalpais watershed, and the 2004 interpretation for the areas around the Soulaje and Nicasio reservoirs, where the remap wasn't done</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Veg_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Code for the vegetation and landcover mapping units used by AIS in creating the map.  This column is for the 2009 update.</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>ConDensity_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Bird's eye cover by conifers</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>Greater than 60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>40-60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>25-40%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>10-25%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>2-10%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>9</edomv>
            <edomvd>not applicable</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>HWoodDensity_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Bird's eye cover by hardwoods</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>Greater than 60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>40-60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>25-40%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>10-25%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>2-10%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>9</edomv>
            <edomvd>not applicable</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>ShrubDensity_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Bird's eye cover by shrubs</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>greater than 60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>40-60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>25-40%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>10-25%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>2-10%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>9</edomv>
            <edomvd>not applicable</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Broom_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>presence and severity of French broom, Scotch broom and Spanish broom</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>0</edomv>
            <edomvd>Minimal, no disturbance visible</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>Low: 1-5% of the polygon had visible broom</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>Moderate: 5-10% of the polygon had broom visible</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>Sever: over 10% of the polygon had broom visible</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>SOD_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The disturbance modifier for the presence of dead vegetation, which was tanoak infected by SOD in most cases:</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>0</edomv>
            <edomvd>Minimal or no mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>Low: 1-5% of the polygon had canopy mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>Moderate: 5-10% of the polygon had canopy mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>Severe: over 10% of the polygon had canopy mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>FieldCheck_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>A value of 1 was assigned to a polygon when the photo interpreter or the reviewer (the person who conducted the quality control) had a question about a polygon that needed to be checked by a field crew person. Once the question was answered, the veg code was assigned based on the field crew’s findings, and a value of 2 was given to the field attribute in the polygon. A value of 3 was given to polygons that required the reviewer’s guidance, but was not necessarily a field question. Once addressed by the reviewer, then the field value was changed to another pertinent code. There should not be any field attributes with a value of 3 remaining in the final coverage. They were all changed to a different code after being reviewed in the final quality control (QC) check. A value of 4 was given to polygons that were reviewed by MMWD in the Accuracy Assessment. A value of 5 was given to polygons that were reviewed by the AIS’s sub-consultant, Jeff Kennedy of GeoBotany</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>Field Questions flagged by photointerpreter</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>Answered field questions</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>Internal review (should not appear in final)</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>reviewed by MMWD staff</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>Reviewed by Jeff Kennedy</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>QC_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The QC attribute has a value of either 0 for no quality control check or 1 for quality control check performed</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Comment_09</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Any information regarding the field questions from AIS was noted in this field in order to better guide the field crew person to what the specific field question was</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Veg_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Code for the vegetation and landcover mapping units used by AIS in creating the map.  This column is for the original dataset, and is what is interpreted to NVCS, cacode, rarity, and crosswalking fields for the polygons that were not re-evaluated.</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>ConDensity_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Bird's eye cover by conifers for the polygons that were not re-evaluated using 2009 imagery.</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>greater than 60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>40-60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>25-40%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>10-25%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>2-10%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>9</edomv>
            <edomvd>not applicable</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>HWoodDensity_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Bird's eye cover by hardwoods for the polygons that were not re-evaluated using 2009 imagery.</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>&gt;60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>40-60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>25-40%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>10-25%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>2-10%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>9</edomv>
            <edomvd>not applicable</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>ShrubDensity_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Bird's eye cover by shrub for the polygons that were not re-evaluated using 2009 imagery.</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>&gt;60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>40-60%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>25-40%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>4</edomv>
            <edomvd>10-25%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>5</edomv>
            <edomvd>2-10%</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>9</edomv>
            <edomvd>not applicable</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Broom_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Presence and severity of French broom, Scotch broom and Spanish broom for the polygons that were not re-evaluated using 2009 imagery.</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>0</edomv>
            <edomvd>Minimal, no disturbance visible</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>Low: 1-5% of the polygon had visible broom</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>Moderate: 5-10% of the polygon had broom visible</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>Severe: over 10% of the polygonon had broom visible</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>SOD_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The disturbance modifier for the presence of dead vegetation, which was tanoak infected by SOD in most cases.</attrdef>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>0</edomv>
            <edomvd>Minimal or no mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>1</edomv>
            <edomvd>low: 1-5% of the polygon had canopy mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>2</edomv>
            <edomvd>Moderate: 5-10% of the polygon had canopy mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>3</edomv>
            <edomvd>Severe: over 10% of the polygon had canopy mortality</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Note_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Any information regarding the field questions from AIS was noted in this field in order to better guide the field crew person to what the specific field question was</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Field_04</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>A value of 1 was assigned to a polygon when the photo interpreter or the reviewer (the person who conducted the quality control) had a question about a polygon that needed to be checked by a field crew person. Once the question was answered, the veg code was assigned based on the field crew’s findings, and a value of 2 was given to the field attribute in the polygon. A value of 3 was given to polygons that required the reviewer’s guidance, but was not necessarily a field question. Once addressed by the reviewer, then the field value was changed to another pertinent code. There should not be any field attributes with a value of 3 remaining in the final coverage. They were all changed to a different code after being reviewed in the final quality control (QC) check. A value of 4 was given to polygons that were reviewed by MMWD in the Accuracy Assessment. A value of 5 was given to polygons that were reviewed by the AIS’s sub-consultant, Jeff Kennedy of GeoBotany</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>AIS_ID</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Identifier used by AIS in orginal 2004 mapping</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>UID</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Unique identifier for each polygon.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, VegCAMP</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>CALVEGNAME</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>A crosswalk to the CalVeg vegetation system. Note that there may be a one-to-many relationship between CalVeg and NVCS. </attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r5/landmanagement/resourcemanagement/?cid=stelprdb5347192</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>CALVEGCODE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>A crosswalk to the CalVeg vegetation system. Note that there may be a one-to-many relationship between CalVeg and NVCS. </attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/r5/landmanagement/resourcemanagement/?cid=stelprdb5347192</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>CWHRTYPE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>A crosswalk to the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships system. Note that there is usually a one-to-many relationship between CWHR and NVCS</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cwhr/</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>CWHRCODE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>A crosswalk to the California Wildlife Habitat Relationships system. Note that there is usually a one-to-many relationship between CWHR and NVCS</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cwhr/</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>GLOBALRANK</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The global rarity rank of the plant community mapped (only for alliances). </attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://www.natureserve.org/publications/ConsStatusAssess_RankMethodology.jsp</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>STATERANK</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The state rarity rank of the plant community mapped (only for alliances).  </attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://www.natureserve.org/publications/ConsStatusAssess_RankMethodology.jsp</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>RARE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Rarity of the vegetation type. Alliances and associations of those alliances with state or global ranks of S1-S3 are considered rare. Additionally some associations of non-rare alliances are considered rare.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>CA. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, VegCAMP</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <edom>
            <edomv>Y</edomv>
            <edomvd>Rare</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>N</edomv>
            <edomvd>Not Rare</edomvd>
          </edom>
          <edom>
            <edomv>U</edomv>
            <edomvd>Unknown</edomvd>
          </edom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>CACODE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>California Natural Community Codes - unique code assigned to alliances and associations.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, VegCAMP</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>NVCSALLIANCE</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The standardized name for the alliance within the National Vegetation Classification System</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://usnvc.org/</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>NVCSGROUP</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The standardized name for the group within the National Vegetation Classification System.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://usnvc.org/</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>NVCSMG</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>The standardized name for the macrogroup within the National Vegetation Classification System.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>http://usnvc.org/</attrdefs>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Acres</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>GIS-calculated area in acres.</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>Hectares</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>GIS-calculated area in hectares.</attrdef>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>SHAPE_Length</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Length of feature in internal units.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Esri</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <udom>Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.</udom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
      <attr>
        <attrlabl>SHAPE_Area</attrlabl>
        <attrdef>Area of feature in internal units squared.</attrdef>
        <attrdefs>Esri</attrdefs>
        <attrdomv>
          <udom>Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.</udom>
        </attrdomv>
      </attr>
    </detailed>
    <overview>
      <eaover>Note: certain fields have been added by the Department of Fish and Game's Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program. These include crosswalks to the Wildlife Habitat Relationships and CalVeg classification systems, Global and State Ranks, CaCode and the fields relating the mapping units to the National Vegetation Classification System as it is described for California in the 2nd edition of the Manual of California Vegetation</eaover>
    </overview>
  </eainfo>
  <metainfo>
    <metd>20221215</metd>
    <metc>
      <cntinfo>
        <cntorgp>
          <cntorg>Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP)</cntorg>
        </cntorgp>
        <cntemail>VegCAMP@wildlife.ca.gov</cntemail>
      </cntinfo>
    </metc>
    <metstdn>FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata</metstdn>
    <metstdv>FGDC-STD-001-1998</metstdv>
    <mettc>local time</mettc>
  </metainfo>
</metadata>