Population_Centers

Shapefile

Thumbnail Not Available

Tags
california, urban, city, incorporated


Summary

Primary useage for CAL FIRE is for identifying incorporated areas, which are not eligible for State Responsibility Area (SRA) designation. City data is maintained as part of the SRA data maintenance process. Secondary useages are for cartographic purposes, e.g. adding city names and city limits to maps, and for creating contact lists for which cities fall within a certain designation. For CAL FIRE, this was especially relevant for notification of cities with Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.

Description

Complete accounting of all incorporated cities, including the boundary and name of each individual city. Since 2009, this process includes digital capture of every annexation as they are sent to CAL FIRE from the state Board of Equalization.

Credits

Numerous county and cities contributed data, BOE provided notices for every new annexation.

Use limitations

see Citation section for additional constraints

Extent

West  -124.269528    East  -114.514110
North  41.974383    South  32.534033

Scale Range

ArcGIS Metadata 

Topics and Keywords 

Place keywords  california

Theme keywords  urban, city, incorporated

Thesaurus
Title FRAP custom




Citation 

Title Population_Centers


Edition 10_3


Presentation formats  digital map
FGDC geospatial presentation format  vector digital data


Other citation details The user will cite the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as the original source of the data, but will clearly denote cases where the original data have been altered, updated, or in any way changed from the original condition.


Citation Contacts 

Responsible party
Organization's name CAL FIRE - FRAP merge data from various sources
Contact's role  originator


Resource Details 

Dataset languages  English (UNITED STATES)


Status  completed
Spatial representation type  vector


Graphic overview
File namehttp://frap.cdf.ca.gov/data/browsegraphic/incorp.gif
File type GIF

Supplemental information
V10_3 notes (by county): Alameda: updated Livermore, Union City, Pleasanton city boundary using city's online parcel viewer. Obtained new boundary for cities of Dublin and Fremont. Annexation to Dublin added 11/2010. Amador: replaced all city boundaries using data from county website, except I had to request a map from City of Sutter Creek, which did not include a large area on the SW the county data called incorporated. Contra Costa: obtained new city boundaries from county GIS website, resulted in annexed areas for San Ramon, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Oakley. Humboldt: minor edits to adjust cities to parcels, using county parcel viewer Inyo: edited Bishop city boundary to match parcels, using Inyo online parcel viewer Kern: replaced entire county using data from county website Kings: replaced all city boundaries using data downloaded from county website Lassen: boundary of small annexed island southwest of Susanville changed to be a single parcel Marin: replaced all city boundaries using data downloaded form county website, used coast instead of city bounds that extended into Bay Modoc: replaced Alturas boundary, using tax rate area 001000 from parcel data Monterey: edited King City, Soledad, Carmel, and Pacific Grove using online GIS viewer Orange: annexations to San Jaun Capistrano and San Clemente. Obtained updated countywide city boundaries (7/2010), which resulted in numerous unincorporated islands within cities being annexed. Also, numerous isolated parcels within the unincorporated area east of Tustin were apparatnly annexed by that city. Updated countywide city boundaries once again from data received 1/3/2011. This dataset seemed to fix some registration problems for a few cities. Riverside: annexations were derived from a countywide dataset (10/6/10) which included the new city of Eastvale, plus annexations to Corona, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, Palm Desert, Coachella, and Cathedral City. 11/10 4,500 acre annexation to Temecula. Sacramento: 860 acre annexation to Rancho Cordova San Bernardino: City of Big Bear boundary extended into lake, probably sphere of influence, corrected it to follow lakeshore. 10/28/10 Updated all city boundaries using data from the county. 11/10 Yucaipa annexation. San Joaquin: 4 annexations to City of Manteca San Luis Obispo: replaced all city boundaries, some of new city lines don't exactly line up with parcels Santa Barbara: reshaped small incorporated island south of Lompoc, based on new parcel data. Single parcel annexed to City of Santa Barbara south of Las Canoas road. Santa Clara: Los Gatos Arnerich Road 64 acre annexation eliminated SRA, created a 126 acre SRA island. Santa Cruz: 1 acre single parcel nanexation to Scotts Valley Sierra: edited Loyalton using TRA field in parcel data Tehama: single parcel annexed to Red Bluff Tulare: annexations to cities of Tulare, Visalia, and Porterville (3) V10_2 notes (by county): Butte: obtained city boundaries from County, used them to replace all Butte County city boundaries. The new city boundaries are a MAJOR improvement, they line up perfectly with county parcel data Nevada: minor updates to correct data from previous releases; 1) Nevada City: 2 parcels annexed that were SRA; Truckee: adjusted alignment of northern obundary to match parcels Placer: minor updates to correct data from previous releases; 1) Colfax: 1 parcel annexed that was SRA; 2) Auburn: 1 parcel annexed that was SRA, minor changes not affecting SRA, unincorporated island added 3) replaced boundaries for Rocklin/Roseville/Loomis, using updated data from county with better parcel alignment San Bernardino: significant annexation to city of San Bernardino, minor annexation to Fontana Santa Clara: obtained city boundaries from County, used them to replace all Santa Clara County city boundaries. The new city boundaries are a MAJOR improvement, they line up perfectly with county parcel data. Siskiyou: minor annexation to Mount shasta Ventura: annexation to Simi Valley Yuba: updates to correct data from previous releases; 1) Wheatland boundary replaced, significantly different 2) minor change to Marysville V10_1 notes: data versions will now be named for the sequential release number within that calendar year, e.g. 10_1 refers to the first release in 2010. Numerous annexations occurred in 2009, those affecting SRA lands by CAL FIRE Unit include (acres in parentheses); AEU: Placerville (4,5) BTU - Paradise (11) HUU: Rio Dell (300) KRN: Techachapi (7) LAC: Diamond Bar (116, small portion of this was SRA) LMU: Susanville (9) LNU: Healdsburg (258, 5) NEU: Nevada City (61, 2) ORC: San Clemente (11, 12) RRU: Lake Elsinore (246) SBC: Slvang (9) SCU - Dublin (187), San Ramon (289), Los Gatos (79), Saratoga (20), Los Altos (13), Morgan Hill (20) TGU: Red Bluff (49, 3) TUU: Replaced city boundaries with more accurate data, minor changes for Porterville and Woodlake V07_4 notes: El Dorado: minor change to the South Lake Tahoe city boundary - small area annexation or error fix. Lake: new Lakeport boundary consolidates the two former city polygons into a single larger city polygon Los Angeles: updated boundary for Palmdale Nevada: updated city boundaries align better with parcels, includes annexations for Grass Valley. Riverside: updated incorporated city resulted in significant changes, including 2 new cities (Menifee and Wildomar). Significant annexations occurred in the cities of Riverside, Beaumont, Lake Elsinore, Cathedral City, and Indio. Additional annexations occurred in Corona, Moreno Valley, Rancho Mirage, Desert Hot Springs, Coachella, Blythe, and La Quinta. Lake Elsinore 590 acre annexation dated 2/25/09 recevied from BOE. Santa Clara: new city boundary for Cupertino. Note: the boundary provided by the city did not line up with our county parcels along the western part of the city - city parcels are different than the county parcels in this area. Tuolumne: finally resolved issues related to City of Sonora boundary. The city boundary does NOT follow parcel lines along the Southwest and Southern boundary. These are CALTRANS parcels and the city follows the road rather than the parcel lines. Siskiyou: Refined boundary for Weed to better conform to county parcel data Ventura: updated boundaries for entire county's cities obtained. Resulted in minor annexations for Fillmore, Santa Paula, Simi Valley, Camarillo, and Ventura. The new boundaries align better with parcels for the other cities. v07_3 notes: Extensive changes were made as part of the FHSZ mapping project. Specifically, by county; Alameda: Pleasanton boundary was alligned with parcels based on a 2008 map showing residential projects obtained from the city's web site. This included a new annexation. Butte: received updated boundary for Chico and Oroville, includes new incorporations and lines up much better with parcels Monterey: replaced city of Monterey boundary with data from city website dated 3/2006, still doesnt seem to completely line up with parcels Orange: Laguna Woods had 175 acre Laurel annexation. Brea had a small annexation of lands that were once in LA County. Placer: updated Colfax boundary Plumas: new boundary for Portola, includes annexations San Luis Obispo: Updated boundary for Paso Robles. Updated Atascadero boundary resulted in removing a large area from incorporation in the southwest vicinty of the city. Pismo Beach had a minor change that resulted in merging the two distinct polygons into one. We obtained and included the official boundary for Morro Bay, even though it does not line up well with parcels. San Bernardino: numerous boundaries adjusted based on new countywide data. Mostly sliver fixes, small annexations for Highland and Rancho Cucamonga. Santa Clara County: city boundaries were alligned with parcels based on online maps/GIS viewers for Cupertino, Saratoga, Los Gatos, Morgan Hill, and Gilroy. Also, a new annexation was captured from 4/18/07 in the Evergreen area of San Jose. Shasta: new boundary for Redding and Anderson, includes new annexation in Redding Tuolumne County: There is still an issue with City of Sonora boundary. The boundary obtained from the county was snapped to parcel lines, except in the south where the city indicated that the city follows the road and splits parcels. This boundary may require further adjustment for the next release. Yolo: numerous boundaries adjusted based on new data from the county Minor changes were made to snap portions of city limits to parcels in the following cities: La Canada Flintridge, Sierra Madre, South Lake Tahoe, La Mesa v07_2 notes: this version fixes errors found in three counties, no other changes occurred; 1) Alameda: v07_1 included erroneously had identified 4 cities that are not incorporated - Castro Valley, Fairview, Ashland, and San Lorenzo. These were removed. 2) v07_1 showed a small piece of the City of La Habra extending north from Orange County into Los Angeles County. This small extension is actually unincorporated, the Los Angeles County GIS viewer labels it as La Habra Heights Islands . It was changed to unicnroporated in v07_2. 3) New annexations were fixed in Brea, Orange, Irvine, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente. v07_1: first version that included individual cities, not just the outer extent of incorporated areas. This required a major workload to locate and include all these internal boundaries.
Processing environment Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.1.1.3143


Credits
Numerous county and cities contributed data, BOE provided notices for every new annexation.

Extents 

Extent
Description
ground condition
Extent
Geographic extent
Bounding rectangle
West longitude -124.34996
East longitude -113.881253
South latitude 32.440116
North latitude 41.988837

Extent
Geographic extent
Bounding rectangle
Extent type  Extent used for searching
West longitude -124.269528
East longitude -114.514110
North latitude 41.974383
South latitude 32.534033
Extent contains the resource Yes

Resource Points of Contact 

Point of contact
Individual's name CAL FIRE SRA Data Manager
Organization's name CAL FIRE
Contact's position CAL FIRE SRA Data Manager
Contact's role  point of contact


Contact information
Phone
Voice 916-327-3939
Fax 916-324-1180

Address
Type physical
Delivery point 1300 U St.
City Sacramento
Administrative area CA
Postal code 95814
Country US
e-mail addressFrapdatacontact@fire.ca.gov

Hours of service M-F 8-5


Resource Maintenance 

Resource maintenance
Update frequency  as needed


Resource Constraints 

Legal constraints
Limitations of use
DISCLAIMER The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps. The user will not seek to hold the State or the Department liable under any circumstances for any damages with respect to any claim by the user or any third party on account of or arising from the use of data or maps. There are no restrictions on distribution of the data by users. However, users are encouraged to refer others to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to acquire the data, in case updated data become available.
Constraints
Limitations of use
see Citation section for additional constraints

Spatial Reference 

Reference system identifier
Value 3857
Codespace EPSG
Version 7.11.2


Spatial Data Properties 

Vector
Level of topology for this dataset  geometry only


Geometric objects
Object type  composite
Object count 764



Data Quality 

Scope of quality information
Resource level  dataset




Data quality report - Conceptual consistency
Measure description V07_4: City boundaries that follow the coast or follow county boundaries were replaced using the CMCC standard data layer, currently cnty100k07_1. This ensures the city data will be registered to other FRAP data. Unfortunately, it was not possible to distinguish city boundaries that extend to the coast versus those that leave a small strip of beach - these were all extended to the standard coastline. There are several small "satellite" polygons midway between 2 or more cities, and it could not be determined which city they ar a part of. These are coded as incorporated areas, with name = 'UNKNOWN'.




Data quality report - Completeness omission
Measure description The state Controllers office provided an updated list of all cities by county. This data matches that list exactly.




Data quality report - Absolute external positional accuracy
Dimension horizontal


Measure description Since almost all the city boundaries are derived from parcel data, accuracy will vary for different counties. There are Known problem areas: - Counties where we had no access to parcel data: Colusa, Del Norte, Imperial




Distribution 

Distributor
Contact information
Individual's name FRAP Data Librarian
Organization's name CAL FIRE - FRAP
Contact's position FRAP Data Librarian
Contact's role  distributor


Contact information
Phone
Voice 916-327-3939
Fax 916-324-1180

Address
Type physical
Delivery point 1300 U St.
City Sacramento
Administrative area CA
Postal code 95814
Country US
e-mail addressFRAPDatacontact@fire.ca.gov

Hours of service M-F 8-5


Ordering process

Transfer options
Online source
Description  incorp10_3



Distribution format
Name Shapefile


Transfer options
Transfer size 7.045


Online source
Location CDF: http://fphqfp/fpweb/CDFStaticDataDownloads.aspx

Online source
Location PUBLIC: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/data/frapgisdata/select.asp

Online source
Location \\Molib01\GIS_Library\Cultural\City_Polygons\incorp10_3.gdb

Fields 

Details for object Population_Centers 
Definition
Incorporated city polygons, bounded by city limits


Field FID
 
Field description
Internal feature number.
Description source
Esri
Description of values Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.




Field Shape
 
Field description
Feature geometry.
Description source
ESRI
Description of values Coordinates defining the features.




Field TYPE
 
Field description
polygon type
List of values
Description not an incorporated city


Value CITY
Description Incorporated city




Field TYPE_CODE
 
Field description
Integer code for polygon type
List of values
Value 0
Description not an incorporated city


Value 1
Description incorporated city




Field NAME
 
Field description
City name
Description of values Name of city






Metadata Details 

Metadata language English (UNITED STATES)
Metadata character set  utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format


Scope of the data described by the metadata  dataset
Scope name  dataset


Last update 2014-10-23


Metadata Contacts 

Metadata contact
Individual's name CAL FIRE SRA Coordinator
Organization's name CAL FIRE - FRAP
Contact's position CAL FIRE SRA Coordinator
Contact's role  point of contact


Contact information
Phone
Voice 916-327-3939
Fax 916-324-1180

Address
e-mail addressFRAPDatacontact@fire.ca.gov

Hours of service M-F 8-5


FGDC Metadata (read-only) 

Identification 

Citation
Citation Information
OriginatorCAL FIRE - FRAP merge data from various sources
Publication Date12/2010
Title
Incorporated Cities (incorp10_3)
Edition10_3
Geospatial Data Presentation Formvector digital data
Other Citation Details
The user will cite the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as the original source of the data, but will clearly denote cases where the original data have been altered, updated, or in any way changed from the original condition.
Online Linkage\\Molib01\GIS_Library\Cultural\City_Polygons\incorp10_3.gdb
Online LinkageCDF: http://fphqfp/fpweb/CDFStaticDataDownloads.aspx
Online LinkagePUBLIC: http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/data/frapgisdata/select.asp

Description
Abstract
                            Complete accounting of all incorporated cities, including the boundary and name of each individual city. Since 2009, this process includes digital capture of every annexation as they are sent to CAL FIRE from the state Board of Equalization. 
                          
Purpose
                            Primary useage for CAL FIRE is for identifying incorporated areas, which are not eligible for State Responsibility Area (SRA) designation. City data is maintained as part of the SRA data maintenance process. 

Secondary useages are for cartographic purposes, e.g. adding city names and city limits to maps, and for creating contact lists for which cities fall within a certain designation. For CAL FIRE, this was especially relevant for notification of cities with Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones.
                          
Supplemental Information
                            V10_3 notes (by county):

Alameda: updated Livermore, Union City, Pleasanton city boundary using city's online parcel viewer. Obtained new boundary for cities of Dublin and Fremont. Annexation to Dublin added 11/2010.

Amador: replaced all city boundaries using data from county website, except I had to request a map from City of Sutter Creek, which did not include a large area on the SW the county data called incorporated.

Contra Costa: obtained new city boundaries from county GIS website, resulted in annexed areas for San Ramon, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Oakley.

Humboldt: minor edits to adjust cities to parcels, using county parcel viewer

Inyo: edited Bishop city boundary to match parcels, using Inyo online parcel viewer

Kern: replaced entire county using data from county website

Kings: replaced all city boundaries using data downloaded from county website

Lassen: boundary of small annexed island southwest of Susanville changed to be a single parcel

Marin: replaced all city boundaries using data downloaded form county website, used coast instead of city bounds that extended into Bay

Modoc: replaced Alturas boundary, using tax rate area 001000 from parcel data

Monterey: edited King City, Soledad, Carmel, and Pacific Grove using online GIS viewer

Orange: annexations to San Jaun Capistrano and San Clemente. Obtained updated countywide city boundaries (7/2010), which resulted in numerous unincorporated islands within cities being annexed. Also, numerous isolated parcels within the unincorporated area east of Tustin were apparatnly annexed by that city. Updated countywide city boundaries once again from data received 1/3/2011. This dataset seemed to fix some registration problems for a few cities.  

Riverside: annexations were derived from a countywide dataset (10/6/10) which included the new city of Eastvale, plus annexations to Corona, Desert Hot Springs, Indio, Palm Desert, Coachella, and Cathedral City. 11/10 4,500 acre annexation to Temecula.

Sacramento: 860 acre annexation to Rancho Cordova

San Bernardino: City of Big Bear boundary extended into lake, probably sphere of influence, corrected it to follow lakeshore. 10/28/10 Updated all city boundaries using data from the county. 11/10 Yucaipa annexation.

San Joaquin: 4 annexations to City of Manteca

San Luis Obispo: replaced all city boundaries, some of new city lines don't exactly line up with parcels

Santa Barbara: reshaped small incorporated island south of Lompoc, based on new parcel data. Single parcel annexed to City of Santa Barbara south of Las Canoas road.

Santa Clara: Los Gatos Arnerich Road 64 acre annexation eliminated SRA, created a 126 acre SRA island.

Santa Cruz: 1 acre single parcel nanexation to Scotts Valley

Sierra: edited Loyalton using TRA field in parcel data

Tehama: single parcel annexed to Red Bluff

Tulare: annexations to cities of Tulare, Visalia, and Porterville (3)

V10_2 notes (by county):

Butte: obtained city boundaries from County, used them to replace all Butte County city boundaries. The new city boundaries are a MAJOR improvement, they line up perfectly with county parcel data

Nevada: minor updates to correct data from previous releases; 1) Nevada City: 2 parcels annexed that were SRA; Truckee: adjusted alignment of northern obundary to match parcels

Placer: minor updates to correct data from previous releases; 1) Colfax: 1 parcel annexed that was SRA; 2) Auburn: 1 parcel annexed that was SRA, minor changes not affecting SRA, unincorporated island added 3) replaced boundaries for Rocklin/Roseville/Loomis, using updated data from county with better parcel alignment

San Bernardino: significant annexation to city of San Bernardino, minor annexation to Fontana

Santa Clara: obtained city boundaries from County, used them to replace all Santa Clara County city boundaries. The new city boundaries are a MAJOR improvement, they line up perfectly with county parcel data.

Siskiyou: minor annexation to Mount shasta

Ventura: annexation to Simi Valley

Yuba:  updates to correct data from previous releases; 1) Wheatland boundary replaced, significantly different 2) minor change to Marysville 


V10_1 notes: data versions will now be named for the sequential release number within that calendar year, e.g. 10_1 refers to the first release in 2010. Numerous annexations occurred in 2009, those affecting SRA lands by CAL FIRE Unit include (acres in parentheses);
AEU: Placerville (4,5)
BTU - Paradise (11)
HUU: Rio Dell (300)
KRN: Techachapi (7)
LAC: Diamond Bar (116, small portion of this was SRA)
LMU: Susanville (9)
LNU: Healdsburg (258, 5)
NEU: Nevada City (61, 2)
ORC: San Clemente (11, 12)
RRU: Lake Elsinore (246)
SBC: Slvang (9)
SCU - Dublin (187), San Ramon (289), Los Gatos (79), Saratoga (20), Los Altos (13), Morgan Hill (20) 
TGU: Red Bluff (49, 3)
TUU: Replaced city boundaries with more accurate data, minor changes for Porterville and Woodlake

V07_4 notes:

El Dorado: minor change to the South Lake Tahoe city boundary - small area annexation or error fix.
Lake: new Lakeport boundary consolidates the two former city polygons into a single larger city polygon 
Los Angeles: updated boundary for Palmdale
Nevada: updated city boundaries align better with parcels, includes annexations for Grass Valley.
Riverside: updated incorporated city resulted in significant changes, including 2 new cities (Menifee and Wildomar). Significant annexations occurred in the cities of Riverside, Beaumont, Lake Elsinore, Cathedral City, and Indio. Additional annexations occurred in Corona, Moreno Valley, Rancho Mirage, Desert Hot Springs, Coachella, Blythe, and La Quinta. Lake Elsinore 590 acre annexation dated 2/25/09 recevied from BOE.
Santa Clara: new city boundary for Cupertino. Note: the boundary provided by the city did not line up with our county parcels along the western part of the city - city parcels are different than the county parcels in this area.
Tuolumne: finally resolved issues related to City of Sonora boundary. The city boundary does NOT follow parcel lines along the Southwest and Southern boundary. These are CALTRANS parcels and the city follows the road rather than the parcel lines.
Siskiyou: Refined boundary for Weed to better conform to county parcel data
Ventura: updated boundaries for entire county's cities obtained. Resulted in minor annexations for Fillmore, Santa Paula, Simi Valley, Camarillo, and Ventura. The new boundaries align better with parcels for the other cities. 

v07_3 notes:

Extensive changes were made as part of the FHSZ mapping project. Specifically, by county;

Alameda: Pleasanton boundary was alligned with parcels based on a 2008 map showing residential projects obtained from the city's web site. This included a new annexation. 
Butte: received updated boundary for Chico and Oroville, includes new incorporations and lines up much better with parcels
Monterey: replaced city of Monterey boundary with data from city website dated 3/2006, still doesnt seem to completely line up with parcels
Orange: Laguna Woods had 175 acre Laurel annexation. Brea had a small annexation of lands that were once in LA County.
Placer: updated Colfax boundary
Plumas: new boundary for Portola, includes annexations
San Luis Obispo: Updated boundary for Paso Robles. Updated Atascadero boundary resulted in removing a large area from incorporation in the southwest vicinty of the city. Pismo Beach had a minor change that resulted in merging the two distinct polygons into one. We obtained and included the official boundary for Morro Bay, even though it does not line up well with parcels. 
San Bernardino: numerous boundaries adjusted based on new countywide data. Mostly sliver fixes, small annexations for Highland and Rancho Cucamonga.
Santa Clara County: city boundaries were alligned with parcels based on online maps/GIS viewers for Cupertino, Saratoga, Los Gatos, Morgan Hill, and Gilroy.  Also, a new annexation was captured from 4/18/07 in the Evergreen area of San Jose.
Shasta: new boundary for Redding and Anderson, includes new annexation in Redding
Tuolumne County: There is still an issue with City of Sonora boundary. The boundary obtained from the county was snapped to parcel lines, except in the south where the city indicated that the city follows the road and splits parcels. This boundary may require further adjustment for the next release.  
Yolo: numerous boundaries adjusted based on new data from the county

Minor changes were made to snap portions of city limits to parcels in the following cities: 
La Canada Flintridge, Sierra Madre, South Lake Tahoe, La Mesa


v07_2 notes: this version fixes errors found in three counties, no other changes occurred;
1) Alameda: v07_1 included erroneously had identified 4 cities that are not incorporated - Castro Valley, Fairview, Ashland, and San Lorenzo. These were removed.
2) v07_1 showed a small piece of the City of La Habra extending north from Orange County into Los Angeles County. This small extension is actually unincorporated, the Los Angeles County GIS viewer labels it as La Habra Heights Islands . It was changed to unicnroporated in v07_2.
3) New annexations were fixed in Brea, Orange, Irvine, San Juan Capistrano, and San Clemente. 
 
v07_1: first version that included individual cities, not just the outer extent of incorporated areas. This required a major workload to locate and include all these internal boundaries.
                          
Time Period of Content
Time Period Information
Single Date/Time
Calendar Date12/2010
Currentness Reference
                            ground condition
                          
Status
ProgressComplete
Maintenance and Update FrequencyAs needed

Spatial Domain
Bounding Coordinates
West Bounding Coordinate-124.349960
East Bounding Coordinate-113.881253
North Bounding Coordinate41.988837
South Bounding Coordinate32.440116

Keywords
Theme
Theme Keyword ThesaurusFRAP custom
Theme Keywordcity
Theme Keywordincorporated
Theme Keywordurban

Place
Place Keywordcalifornia

Access Constraints
                        None
                      
Use Constraints
                        see Citation section for additional constraints
                      
Point of Contact
Contact Information
Contact Person Primary
Contact PersonCAL FIRE SRA Data Manager
Contact OrganizationCAL FIRE
Contact PositionCAL FIRE SRA Data Manager
Contact Address
Address Typephysical address
Address1300 U St.
CitySacramento
State or ProvinceCA
Postal Code95814
CountryUNITED STATES

Contact Voice Telephone916-327-3939
Contact Facsimile Telephone916-324-1180
Contact Electronic Mail AddressFrapdatacontact@fire.ca.gov
Hours of ServiceM-F 8-5

Browse Graphic
Browse Graphic File Namehttp://frap.cdf.ca.gov/data/browsegraphic/incorp.gif
Browse Graphic File TypeGIF

Data Set Credit
                        Numerous county and cities contributed data, BOE provided notices for every new annexation.
                      
Native Data Set Environment
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 3; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.3.1.3500

Data Quality 

Logical Consistency Report
                        V07_4: City boundaries that follow the coast or follow county boundaries were replaced using the CMCC standard data layer, currently cnty100k07_1. This ensures the city data will be registered to other FRAP data. Unfortunately, it was not possible to distinguish city boundaries that extend to the coast versus those that leave a small strip of beach - these were all extended to the standard coastline.

There are several small "satellite" polygons midway between 2 or more cities, and it could not be determined which city they ar a part of. These are coded as incorporated areas, with name = 'UNKNOWN'.
                      
Completeness Report
                        The state Controllers office provided an updated list of all cities by county. This data matches that list exactly. 
                      
Positional Accuracy
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Report
                                Since almost all the city boundaries are derived from parcel data, accuracy will vary for different counties. There are Known problem areas:

- Counties where we had no access to parcel data: Colusa, Del Norte, Imperial

                              
Lineage

Spatial Reference 

Horizontal Coordinate System Definition
Planar
Planar Coordinate Information
Planar Coordinate Encoding Methodcoordinate pair
Coordinate Representation
Abscissa Resolution0.000100
Ordinate Resolution0.000100
Planar Distance Unitsmeters

Geodetic Model
Horizontal Datum NameNorth American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid NameGeodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major Axis6378137.000000
Denominator of Flattening Ratio298.257222

Vertical Coordinate System Definition
Altitude System Definition
Altitude Resolution0.000100
Altitude Encoding MethodExplicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

Entities and Attributes 

Distribution Information 

Distributor
Contact Information
Contact Person Primary
Contact PersonFRAP Data Librarian
Contact OrganizationCAL FIRE - FRAP
Contact PositionFRAP Data Librarian
Contact Address
Address Typephysical address
Address1300 U St.
CitySacramento
State or ProvinceCA
Postal Code95814
CountryUNITED STATES

Contact Voice Telephone916-327-3939
Contact Facsimile Telephone916-324-1180
Contact Electronic Mail AddressFRAPDatacontact@fire.ca.gov
Hours of ServiceM-F 8-5

Resource Descriptionincorp10_3
Distribution Liability
                        
DISCLAIMER
The State of California and the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy of data or maps.  The user will not seek to hold the State or the Department liable under any circumstances for any damages with respect to any claim by the user or any third party on account of or arising from the use of data or maps.
There are no restrictions on distribution of the data by users. However, users are encouraged to refer others to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to acquire the data, in case updated data become available.

                      
Standard Order Process
Digital Form
Digital Transfer Information
Transfer Size6.054

Custom Order Process
none


Metadata Reference 

Metadata Date2012-02-16
Metadata Contact
Contact Information
Contact Person Primary
Contact PersonCAL FIRE SRA Coordinator
Contact OrganizationCAL FIRE - FRAP
Contact PositionCAL FIRE SRA Coordinator
Contact Address
Address TypeREQUIRED: The mailing and/or physical address for the organization or individual.
CityREQUIRED: The city of the address.
State or ProvinceREQUIRED: The state or province of the address.
Postal CodeREQUIRED: The ZIP or other postal code of the address.

Contact Voice Telephone916-327-3939
Contact Facsimile Telephone916-324-1180
Contact Electronic Mail AddressFRAPDatacontact@fire.ca.gov
Hours of ServiceM-F 8-5

Metadata Standard NameFGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata Standard VersionFGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata Time Conventionlocal time


Metadata Access Constraintsnone
Metadata Use Constraints
none